James Kuegler Coaching
  • Coaching
    • Training Programme
    • TTT Runners
    • RERE
    • One-on-One Coaching
  • Events
  • Articles
  • Coaches
    • James Kuegler
    • Andrew Thompson
    • Lisa Cross
  • Contact Me

Blog

The 104 Week Training Programme

1/10/2017

10 Comments

 
Could you, as an enthusiastic amateur runner, train essentially the same way for 104 weeks if you knew that it could give you long term lasting benefits?

​These 104 weeks would consist of running six days a week, with five x one hour runs, a day off and one long run of approximately two and a half hours. All of these runs would be undertaken at an aerobic intensity.
Picture
One might suggest the benefit of a prolonged period of aerobic running would be a strengthened cardiovascular system and a more efficient use of your body’s stores of energy. Aerobic foundation is key to efficient performance. Developing your capacity for aerobic respiration, whereby oxygen is used without the breakdown of glycogen from your muscles to supplement your energy needs is the bedrock of endurance.

When glycogen gets into the picture, we get into anaerobic exercise the realm of explosive movement and threshold effort or ‘suicide pace’ as Steve Prefontaine romantically described it. Anaerobic exercise hurts, and requires extra fuel, rather than relying on our body’s ample stores. Anaerobic exercise is akin to setting a box of matches alight. The flame burns hot and bright, but it goes out quickly.

Imagine running for 624 days at an aerobic pace, burning your matches one at a time. This method yields a smaller flame, but these flames last longer, and there are more of them. Would it challenge you to slow down to speed up? The slower and more efficiently your cardiovascular system works, the easier it will be to transfer oxygen to the blood, and the more effort it will take for your heart to get up to your maximum aerobic heart rate; ergo, as your aerobic capacity develops you’ll run faster with a relatively lower heart rate. Come time to race, accessing the increased cardiovascular headroom when needed would yield greater pace, with less effort. When it does come time to set the matchbox alight and run at an anaerobic pace, it would be at a significantly higher level of respiration, your fuse would be longer, and when the matchbox caught it would burn very bright.

​Consider another side to this 104 weeks; Could you put aside competition for 104 weeks if you knew that in the longer term you would perform more efficiently? I would suggest that for most of us, putting aside our seemingly infectious desire to compete in multiple events would be the most confronting facet of this manner of training. I guess if we were to look at what we want out of running, and why we run, we might reconsider this. Do you run to compete in multiple events, regardless of the period of time between them? Do you run only for medals? Does the the perceived reward around your neck validate your experience? Or do you run as an it is an integral part of your being, that you see directly impacts your well being and will be something you will do for the whole of your life? I would suggest if you value progression, growth, and enjoy the meditative rewards of our discipline, 104 weeks building a base of cardiovascular strength out of the 4200 weeks of our average lifespan isn’t that much of challenge at all. 

If you found this article thought provoking, or confronting, leave me a comment below. Contact me if you'd like to know more about actioning the 104 week training programme. Click here to receive more articles like this one.
10 Comments
Dave Cochrane
15/1/2017 10:04:12 pm

I actually would enjoy this, particularly as prioritising my new daughter is going to limit my racing for the next few years.

Reply
Kerensa Leadbetter
16/1/2017 07:28:07 am

This makes so much sense. I want to run reasonable distances as part of my lifestyle and building a strong base sounds great!

Reply
Andy Kenworthy
16/1/2017 07:33:10 am

I am into it! Am building up but struggling to find all the hours!

Reply
Eric Sila
24/1/2017 08:38:52 pm

On the money JK...previous it was about pb challenging myself then went to medals then how many events regardless time between training or recovery.

Reply
Colin Young link
24/1/2017 09:02:51 pm

Might as well throw in a short 2km run on your rest day and do a 2 year running streak (you can put your name on the list after 1 year).

Reply
Mike Tennent
11/10/2017 04:03:48 pm

How do you define an aerobic pace James? Secondly, I do events these days to test myself, so I could forgo that, but a lot of it is to catch up with my 'family' but I guess if I was happy to throw the ego out the door there is nothing to stop the 2.5 hours run being a slow half marathon?

Reply
James Kuegler link
12/10/2017 09:38:37 am

Have a read of this article http://www.jameskuegler.com/articles/vdot

Reply
Sally Reynolds
16/10/2017 08:59:53 pm

I am interested in trying this type of training as I am returning to Running after nearly a year of hospital visits, surgery and recovery.

Reply
Tim Thatcher
24/10/2017 08:42:51 pm

I like this idea. I like to race once a year with a few other kinds of races such as relays or adventure races thrown in as 'training'. This allows me to base my running around adventures and enjoyment rather than performance and I hope will allow me to run well into my 70's!

Reply
Ritchie Bath
29/9/2020 08:03:25 pm

I’ve run too much too soon for a long time and always end up injured, this is experience has completely taken me away from running as I feel I’ll always end up hurt again.

Slow, steady and something like this could be perfect ? I’m keen to hear more, would be purely for lifestyle too which I like the idea of.

Ps: could it be 2 x 30 min ie: run to work and home?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Events
    Coaching
    Articles
    Picture
© 2015 James Kuegler Coaching. All Rights Reserved. 39 Streamfields Way, Auckland, New Zealand
Picture