James Kuegler Coaching
  • Coaching
    • Training Programme
    • TTT Runners
    • RERE
    • One-on-One Coaching
  • Events
  • Articles
  • About
  • Contact Me

Blog

Does LCHF Improve Performance?

22/10/2017

5 Comments

 
Article by Tim Leeming. Exercise Nutritionist.
 
Anyone who has had anything to do with me, or followed my writing and work, will know that I’m an advocate for eating less carbs, more good fats and – most of all – eating natural, real food.  I’m certainly not the first proponent of such ideas and I’m most definitely not the only one encouraging runners, multisporters, rowers, desk drivers and everyone in between to eat this way.  The most appropriate question now then is, why?  Why eat less carbs, more fat and why make sure they’re in the form of natural, whole foods wherever possible? ​
Is it about performance?  Sure, it’d be fair to assume that an exercise nutritionist’s primary focus is in advancing the performance of athletes by assessing and adjusting the foods they eat.  Perhaps more important than the independent variable of athletic performance is the combination of all factors; “the bigger picture”.  As I consider myself a holistic exercise nutrition coach, it follows that I must look at more than just the performance of a client at one event or on one day.  What even is performance, anyway?  The fact is that there is so much more to it than a result on paper on race day.  To go into depth about all of the other factors is beyond the scope of this article.  As an example, however, the overall health of that individual and the people around them, the consistency of health and performance throughout the training programme and beyond the event and, quite simply, the way they feel from day to day are all important considerations.
 
Let’s get back to performance.  There’s no denying that it’s super important, and that performance is the common denominator for most athletes who approach a new dietary method or some facet of dietary intervention, such as supplements.  Beyond all of the noise and extraneous crap that gets perpetuated throughout social media and the like, scientific research is the vehicle with which we ultimately pick up or put down these dietary interventions.  As the science evolves and tells us more about old supplements, new supplements and indeed entire methods of eating (like paleo, vegetarian of LCHF), we develop more certainty in our decisions.
 
Or do we?
 
A very recent research publication by world-renowned Australian exercise nutrition professor, Louise Burke, provided some strong conclusions that the hardcore LCHFers are struggling to swallow.  Dr Burke and her team at the Australian Institute of Sport completed one of the most rigorous and well-designed studies yet to be published on LCHF eating versus higher-carb methods and how they affect aerobic performance in athletes.
 
I encourage you to follow the reference below and have a read of this study.  Put very basically, the researchers fed groups of 9-10 elite race walkers with diets of either primarily high-carb food, periodised high-carb or low-carb high-fat for three weeks.  During this time, the athletes continued intensive training while many variables were measured pertaining to their oxygen capacity (VO2peak), fat oxidation and overall race walk performance.  The LCHF individuals were the only group to experience a statistically significant impairment of performance in their 10km race walk times, compared to performance increases in the higher-carb eating groups…  Shock!  Horror!  And remember, this study has been applauded for its design and execution.
 
Does this mean that we do away with LCHF if we’re in endurance sports?  Should we go back to our pasta bakes and loaves of bread?
 
I certainly won’t be, and the reason comes back to the bigger picture I talked about earlier.  There is so much more to my life and the lives of all of the athletes that I work with, than the times we achieve on race day.  Daily energy levels, sleep patterns, immunity, the cultural aspects of food and the enjoyment involved with sourcing, growing and preparing it, to name a few.
 
While Dr Burke’s study is a strong one, it has some limitations when we attempt to draw applicable conclusions.  For example, is three weeks really enough time to give keto or low-carb a go before throwing it out due to a lack of performance gain?  What about the qualitative data; how did the athletes feel while eating this way?  What kind of foods did they eat?  And herein lies the difficulty with such tightly controlled scientific studies; the conclusions can lose applicability in the real world.
 
Some of you might also find it interesting to hear that Dr Burke has previously suggested that the paleo diet is not necessarily healthy because it leaves out grains.   Burke qualifies this by saying that fortified grains are how we get a lot of important micronutrients, as if there’s no other fathomable source of such essential nutrients.  Sounds to me like someone who has had their head buried so far in the proverbial sand that is researching and dissecting foods and information, for so long that they’ve lost touch with the power of real, whole foods to nourish and heal. 
 
Another very recent publication by a team of New Zealand researchers followed five multisport athletes for 10 weeks on an extreme LCHF dietary regime; a ketogenic diet.  The study is far less scientifically robust than Burke et al; it had fewer participants, no control group and less control over many variables that would affect the outcomes, to name a few differences.  This New Zealand study did, in fact, conclude that performance was mildly decreased across the board, just as the Australian study showed.  This wasn’t the major conclusion, however.  The authors summarised that the athletes were keen to pursue a modified LCHF diet moving forward because of the unexpected health and wellbeing benefits that they all experienced throughout the 10-week intervention.  So, while their performance was not improving (yet), these individuals were feeling so much better than before that they prioritised health and wellbeing over everything else.  That, right there, is the bigger picture.
 
It’s also very meaningful to state that these studies were only three weeks and 10 weeks in duration, respectively.  There are many reasons why a study would only last so long, money being the major one (a randomised controlled trial like the Australian study can cost somewhere in the millions).  Most LCHF experts (and non-experts) will tell you that adapting to a high-fat diet can take a lot longer than that, particularly if you’re talking about exercise capacity or performance and not just blood markers that show you’ve switched to ketosis.  For what it’s worth, there are anecdotal reports coming out of the NZ high-performance sport facilities (and elsewhere around the world) suggesting that with longer-term fat adaptation (i.e. months and years), athletes aren’t just experiencing improved health, they’re seeing big gains in performance, too.
 
The studies we’ve compared here – despite investigating the same thing – are very, very different.  One is disproportionately more robust than the other, and as a result is published in a scientific journal that is significantly more recognised and has a much further reach.  The point is though, that the practical application of such information is really up to the reader.  I am suggesting that with eating LCHF, there is much more to the story than performance alone.  Additional to this, the generalisation of these studies’ results is limited.  It is becoming ever more pertinent that, while strong study designs can indicate trends over a specified period of time, individual case studies are actually quite applicable and useful.  That is, experimenting with an individual (rather than a large group all doing the exact same thing) is very useful for determining the overall advantages or disadvantages of a way of eating.  We are all very different and we process and utilise foods accordingly.  Some of us work best on a larger proportion of protein than others, and some can operate completely on fats.  It is my conviction that beyond these individual variations, as a society right now we are all eating more carbs than we ever should have been.  Therefore, every one of us could do with shifting towards a little more healthy fat and a few less carbohydrates, regardless of what you “run best on”.
 
References
 
Burke, L. M., Ross, M. L., Garvican‐Lewis, L. A., Welvaert, M., Heikura, I. A., Forbes, S. G., ... & Hawley, J. A. (2017). Low carbohydrate, high fat diet impairs exercise economy and negates the performance benefit from intensified training in elite race walkers. The Journal of physiology, 595(9), 2785-2807.
 
Zinn, C., Wood, M., Williden, M., Chatterton, S., & Maunder, E. (2017). Ketogenic diet benefits body composition and well-being but not performance in a pilot case study of New Zealand endurance athletes. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14(1), 22.
 
Science of Ultra Podcast. Episode 19
NOV 8. EAT TO RUN. WEBINAR
FIND OUT MORE ABOUT COACHING
RECEIVE ARTICLE DIRECT TO YOUR INBOX
5 Comments
Ben Ray
24/10/2017 10:10:23 am

I rigorously tried the High Fat thing whilst undertaking training for distances longer than a marathon. Wanted to believe but I noticed the same thing this study proved.
It's interesting that pro cyclists fuel massively on carbs (gels, energy bars, rice cakes etc). When you need results carbohydrates clearly are important fuel for the body.

Reply
Tim Leeming link
26/10/2017 08:05:38 am

Hey Ben,

Thanks for your comment! It's absolutely true that every individual is different and will function best on different macronutrients and foods. Generally I am advocating LCHF as "lower carb, higher fat" because we're a carb-drunk society. I commend you on taking the time to experiment and work out what's best for you, by listening to your body.

Yes, it's true that we see lots of the pro cyclists fuelling their racing with sugar and carbs, but what they do behind the scences is another story. Certainly we've heard anecdotal evidence that Chris Froome is a big advocate for LCHF, so there's a shift in the old school dogma of "carbs only".

I'm going to talk to this point on our upcoming webinar, Eat to Run. I hope to see you there!

Reply
Ben
25/10/2017 06:27:16 am

Another bloody good read James! It's clear you are very passionate about LCHF, however the one thing that stands out for me is the 'bigger picture' comment.
We all know that LCHF includes a lot of dairy and animal products. There's overwhelming indications now that consuming these foods (even the free-range organic) leads to an increase in some serious health conditions......unless you can afford to live on avocados and macadamias ;)

Reply
Tim Leeming link
26/10/2017 08:15:29 am

Hi Ben,

Thanks for commenting! While, in some circles, there is the opinion that LCHF has to mean more dairy and animal products, the truth is that that's not really the truth! For example, paleo is certainly a style of eating that favours lower carb and higher fat, but does not include dairy. You've also touched on a couple of non-animal products that are high in healthy fats (of which there are many more; coconut products, nuts, seeds). Yes, eating a vegan diet that is LCHF is more difficult, but that's a can of worms we can open another day (with a whole lot of other questions attached).

I have to say again, everyone is different and will function optimally on different foods. Animal products are not necessarily dangerous or unhealthy for everyone - it's never a "catch all". Indeed there are cultures that have thrived for many, many years on 80%++ animal products (the Inuits, for example) and cultures that have thrived on next-to-none animal products. There's also plenty of evidence in the literature supporting the balanced intake of quality meat products.

I'll be touching on the immunogenic response to foods in our upcoming Eat to Run webinar. It's fascinating stuff! I hope to see you there.

Reply
PHP
30/10/2017 12:58:42 pm

I see this referred to later on in the article, but my thoughts as I started reading, were that a few weeks were never going to cut it. I believe it's a long progressive journey to get the body (and mind) used to a switch in diet. Years ago a nutritionist once told me, it can take 2 years for someone to change, and get used to a change, in their diet. I think that meant in several ways, mental, practical - changing the purchasing habits, larder content, meal prep/recipes, let alone the various facets of the body digestion adjustments. Thanks for all the articles guys.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Events
    Coaching
    Articles
    Picture
© 2015 James Kuegler Coaching. All Rights Reserved. 39 Streamfields Way, Auckland, New Zealand
Picture